The Features of Weighting Through Derivation in the Explanation of the Rulings Ayaat

Main Article Content

Mohamed Awwad Al-Khawaldeh
Hala Nayef Mashaqbeh

Abstract

This study aimed to shed light on the subject of measurement and its impact on weighting in the verses of rules, where researchers dealt with the subject through three topics dealt with the first definition of measurement and a statement of evidence of its legitimacy, in the second, the definition of weighting and the statement of evidence of its legitimacy, and in the third on the extent to which weighting is affected by analogy in the verses of rules through the definition of the verses of rules and the statement of the most important applications on that, The problem of research revolves around the research in the fact of proving the impact of measurement on weighting in the verses of rules, the researchers followed the inductive approach by reviewing what the scholars of asset and the scholars of interpretation wrote in their books, And benefit from the extrapolation method to reach the rules and bases, with mentioning some applications of Quranic verses, and analyzing them to know the significance of the rulings in them, the researcher reached many results, the most important of which is that one of the most important effects resulting from preference in analogy is the introduction of jurists into the issue of preference between the concepts of agreement and disagreement, and the reason for that is that the indication may be definitive or may not be so.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Khawaldeh, M. A., & Mashaqbeh, H. N. (2025). The Features of Weighting Through Derivation in the Explanation of the Rulings Ayaat. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(4), 2104–2109. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i4.3151
Section
Articles